Security and privacy assessment
Map relevant activities and controls, record uncertainties and prioritise practical actions.
Explore assessmentsA UAE business may serve several markets through mainland entities, free-zone operations and international suppliers. CyberVantage360 helps establish the security and privacy scope behind that structure. Turn the relevant obligations and customer requirements into a practical assessment, implementation plan and evidence package.
Identify which entity contracts with customers, which team operates the service and where information is handled. A Dubai or Abu Dhabi address alone does not determine every applicable rule or responsibility.
Use those facts to scope the assessment and assign decisions to the appropriate business, technical and legal owners. We can support practical implementation and readiness evidence without merging different jurisdictions into one generic UAE compliance checklist.
The UAE's Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 sets a personal-data protection framework with defined scope and exclusions. DIFC and ADGM publish their own data-protection frameworks. Confirm the regime and any sector rules relevant to the entity and activity.
A group may use common systems across these boundaries. Map responsibilities, information flows and supplier access before approving shared procedures. International transfers and overseas customer obligations need their own assessment rather than an assumption based only on hosting location.
Build an engagement that connects the legal boundary with implementation and evidence.
Map relevant activities and controls, record uncertainties and prioritise practical actions.
Explore assessmentsDefine an ISMS scope that reflects the actual services, shared functions and dependencies.
Explore ISO 27001 supportReview payment flows and remediation needs, with validation requirements confirmed through the applicable route.
Explore PCI DSS supportAssess responsibilities and management practices for the AI systems in the agreed scope.
Explore AI management supportIdentify contracting and operating entities, relevant jurisdictions, systems and supplier interfaces.
Assign applicability questions and control gaps to owners, with evidence requirements and realistic milestones.
Develop maintained records and practical procedures that reflect the approved decisions across the service.
Take a proposed platform or supplier change and identify which entities, customers and information flows it affects. Establish the legal and security decisions before the implementation scope is fixed.
After deployment, verify the configuration and handling practices against those decisions. Record exceptions and dependencies so management can see where further work or specialist advice is needed.
Hypothetical examples, not client case studies or evidence of completed engagements.
A hypothetical UAE group introduces a shared booking and customer-support platform across several entities. Payments, guest records and overseas support are handled through different providers.
The programme separates the privacy and payment boundaries, assigns supplier responsibilities and defines evidence for the agreed controls. The result is a scoped plan rather than a single unsupported compliance statement.
A hypothetical company launches a new service through another group entity while keeping the same engineering team and cloud platform. The corporate change can alter contracts and accountability even when the code is unchanged.
The review maps the new relationship and identifies the decisions required before inherited policies and assurance claims are reused. Technical implementation follows the approved service boundary.
ISO certification, SOC 2 reporting and PCI DSS validation follow different assessment routes. Consulting can prepare the organisation and its evidence; it should not be presented as blanket legal approval or an automatic customer acceptance decision.
Agree delivery arrangements, specialist legal input and independent assessment responsibilities in the proposal. Keep any sector-specific accreditation or appointment requirements explicit.
No. Confirm the entity, activity and applicable federal, free-zone and sector framework before defining the implementation work.
Yes, where they fit. Preserve each entity's responsibilities and evidence rather than assuming shared technology creates identical obligations.
No. The purpose, roles, access, suppliers and relevant transfer conditions also need assessment.
Some evidence and implementation tasks may overlap. Keep the assessed scopes and independent outcome routes distinct.
The entity structure, service, key suppliers, customer requirements and the decision or deadline driving the project.
UAE Legislation: Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021; DIFC Commissioner of Data Protection; ADGM Office of Data Protection guidance; ISO: independent certification; PCI SSC: outsourced processing and validation responsibilities.
Official context checked 13 October 2026. Examples and implementation suggestions are practical recommendations. Confirm applicability, delivery arrangements and any specialist legal or independent assurance role for the engagement.
Share the entities, services and customer commitments. We can scope the assessment and implementation work around the decisions that matter.